Market Update: Lower inflation, less profits?

Lower inflation, less profits?
Markets mostly ignored politics (and football), but a remarkable dynamic sprang up: mega tech growth champions were shunned for smaller companies

Inflation targets: can central banks adjust?
The globally accepted inflation target of 2% has no real economic foundation, so should it be changed upwards if there was good reason to do so?

Trump trumps Truss?
Election focus returns to the US where neither side appears to believe in fiscal prudence anymore. Is a ‘Truss moment’ a fathomable possibility for the US government bond market?

 

Lower inflation, less profits?

Last week was an interesting week in capital markets. Global stocks are a nudge above where they were last Friday in aggregate, but this hides a great deal of variation. There was a steady climb early in the week, led once again by large US mega-caps, but this completely flipped into the latter days. Smaller stocks suddenly dramatically outperformed, while the so-called ‘Magnificent Seven’ (Apple, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, Tesla) sold off sharply. Equities outside of the US – notably in the UK and Europe – pushed ahead too. This dispersion reversal is a remarkable change from the stock market concentration we have seen for most of the year – and it could have significant consequences if it developed into a trend.

Markets hope UK political stability brings economic stability.
The Labour government’s first few days after winning a landslide were eventful but not disruptive for markets. Kier Starmer promised quiet competence in his Downing Street doorstep speech, and the early signs are that investors believe him. Gilt yields came down and sterling climbed against the euro to its highest point in nearly two years. The FTSE 100 was decent from Wednesday onwards – though, as we have noted before, UK large-cap performance is much more about global factors than the domestic economy.

The FTSE 250, on the other hand, is heavily influenced by domestic growth and profit expectations. The broader index had a strong week, and indeed has performed very well through July. Housebuilders in particular have had a great couple of weeks, buoyed by Labour’s plans to build 1.5 million homes in this new parliament. If this is not a market endorsement of the government’s economic policies – it is at the very least an acknowledgement that Labour will not derail a growth recovery.

Sterling strength is particularly interesting. We could interpret it as hope that Starmer will pursue closer (or at least less antagonistic) relations with the EU – but officials have consistently downplayed these suggestions. Perhaps it is simply that markets now see Britain as politically more stable than Europe – following disappointment or confusion around continental elections. That is a dramatic turnaround, less than two years after the ‘Liz Truss moment’ that brought the UK’s capital market standing with the global investor community to its nadir.

Do markets dislike disinflation?
More important for global investors were events in the US. Having pushed up early in the week, the ‘Magnificent Seven’ dropped a bruising 4.3% during Thursday trading. The dominance of these shares meant aggregate losses for the S&P 500 and the MSCI All-World index. The catalyst for this sell-off was fascinating: US inflation, as captured by the CPI data for June, showed the rate falling to 3% year-on-year, below economist expectations and lower than the month before. Month-on-month, prices were even 0.1% lower – the first month of negative inflation (disinflation) since May 2020.

Weaker price data significantly increases the chances that the Federal Reserve could cut interest rates later this month – let alone the September cut markets previously priced in. For most of the year, markets have treated this kind of news as unequivocally positive, as it would allow a new growth cycle to start without materially harming company profits. Instead, markets seemed to suggest that disinflation would mean a reduction in medium-term aggregate profits.

Once again, though, the aggregate picture hides so much. While the S&P 500 sank on Thursday, the Russell 2000 – an index of small-cap US firms – jumped ahead on the CPI news, and is up 4.6% during the week at the time of writing. In fact, on measures of ‘breadth’ (the number of stocks going up or down, not weighted by market cap) last week was extremely positive. The S&P equal-weighted index had one of its strongest ever days relative to the standard weighted S&P 500.

Rate cut prospect brings role reversal.
This is the polar opposite of the market concentration we have been discussing for months. The Mag7 have left all others in the dust for much of this year (Nvidia alone accounts for around a third of the S&P’s total year-to-date returns) and it is only because of their dominance that the localised sell-off at the end of the week looked like an overall sell-off.

In some ways, though, this is a counterintuitive response to weaker inflation data and higher rate cut odds. Usually, the thought is that smaller companies are more sensitive to the ups and downs of an economic cycle, while the valuations of tech mega-caps – as long-duration assets – are boosted by lower rates and easier capital. This thinking has been reinforced by the AI investment boom, which has made new technology demand look constant rather than cyclical. And yet, it is the opposite of how markets reacted last week.

Undoubtedly, investors see the easing of interest rate burden for small-caps as more important than immediate growth. There seems to be a realisation that this will allow them to invest in greater productivity, too, brightening the medium-term picture. Why the tech giants have been punished is not as clear. It could be that their earnings are not as cycle-proof as previously hoped (Nvidia cannot make a profit if the companies it sells to have no money, after all) or it could simply be that some larger investors diversified some of their US equity allocations from large to small and midcap and this disrupted momentum.

In any case, there are reasons to think this market rebalance is positive. We have warned about market concentration for some time, since broad profitability across many sectors is what gives an economy dynamism. The medium-term growth implications are not yet fully clear – easing borrowing might be the bigger boost, or drying capital investment from the big guns might be the bigger drawback – but we can take comfort in the fact that the little guys are expected to be doing better. This is true outside the US too: the dollar has weakened, which is usually positive for global growth. Things might get more volatile from here, but there are signs of hope.

This week’s writers from Tatton Investment Management:
Lothar Mentel
Chief Investment Officer
Jim Kean
Chief Economist
Astrid Schilo
Chief Investment Strategist
Isaac Kean
Investment Writer

Important Information:
This material has been written by Tatton and is for information purposes only and must not be considered as financial advice. We always recommend that you seek financial advice before making any financial decisions. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you originally invested.

Reproduced from the Tatton Weekly with the kind permission of our investment partners Tatton Investment Management

Who are Vizion Wealth?

Our approach to financial planning is simple, our clients are our number one priority and we ensure all our advice, strategies and services are tailored to the specific individual to best meet their longer term financial goals and aspirations. We understand that everyone is unique. We understand that wealth means different things to different people and each client will require a different strategy to build wealth, use and enjoy it during their lifetimes and to protect it for family and loved ones in the future.

All of us at Vizion Wealth are committed to our client’s financial success and would like to have an opportunity to review your individual wealth goals. To find out more, get in touch with us – we very much look forward to hearing from you.

The information contained in this article is intended solely for information purposes only and does not constitute advice.  While every attempt has been made to ensure that the information contained on this article has been obtained from reliable sources, Vizion Wealth is not responsible for any errors or omissions. In no event will Vizion Wealth be liable to the reader or anyone else for any decision made or action taken in reliance on the information provided in this article.